Guest Writers

Dark Endeavors Home Page</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</s
The Boulder Lout</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><di
Articles and Editorials</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</st
Radio Commentaries on KGNU</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}<
Dark Cloud's Passing Acquaintances</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,4
Dark Cloud's Hyde Park Forums</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px)

Email Dark Cloud!</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><d
Jennifer Heath</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div
Chris Daniels</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div c
Mindy Sterling-Houser</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</styl
Bruce Campbell Art</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><
Ashley Snow Macomber</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style
Jeanette M. Barrie Thai Yoga Massage</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto
Lannie Garrett</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div
Olga</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div class=ak5u
SeaFiji</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div class=a
Juke Box In My Head</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style>
The Sandbox</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div cla
Cha-Cha</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div class=a
Nancy Cook's newest</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style>
Duffy Keith</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div cla
Hank Harris</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</style><div cla
Carol H. MacLeod Images</title><style>.ak5u{position:absolute;clip:rect(456px,auto,auto,442px);}</st
Mr. Guard and the other two...........
charming con or the key ingredient, Dave Guard haunts all considerations of the Kingston Trio (all photos off the WEB)

(For the truly dedicated, subsequent articles on the KT are here, here, and here.  This was mostly written in 1998, has some arguable errors, and I’ll get around to putting in shape.  Not soon, but I will.)


The Kingston Trio recently - and deservedly - made the top 100 most important musical acts of the 20th century on several lists.  It was for "Tom Dooley," a song for which Dave Guard is given credit as the arranger.  His is the only member name listed.  But Bob Shane sang lead, and played the famous plectrum banjo part as well. The most requested song of the Trio's is "Scotch and Soda," and although Dave Guard took credit for writing and arranging it, he admitted it was taught to him by baseball great Tom Seaver's parents.  It is famous because Shane sang and played it as a solo.  But Dave Guard is the only name associated with it.

It is, perhaps, of passing interest to note that when this picture was taken in the late 1950's, Donald David Guard was arguably one of the most popular and admired people in the world.  I have no clue as to circumstance or what the event was.  But I’ve seen that expression before.  It is a favorite picture of a man I never even saw in person but still think about, oddly enough.  I still listen to his records.


Text Box:  The reason, of course, is that I have since seen this pose - this scene - a million times in a million back stages with different faces and different clothing styles in the forty odd years since it was taken; if you've ever been in entertainment, you've seen this before.  It's sort of shocking the first time you recognize it for what it is. After that, you hardly notice.


It just about always involves male entertainers.  The lead singer, group leader, or star is, after the show, surrounded by adoring supplicants, generally women - sometimes wives - who may or may not be involved with him at some level.  He may or may not even know them.  Regardless, they want his attention.  They want him so that some of the crowd's adoration that night might, somehow, be shared with them.   Well, start with that.


He has, for whatever reason tonight, no seeming joy in being here.  But then, he's been here before; last night, in fact.  Every last night for some time, now.  He has no polite way to leave.  Most people in entertainment, even the vain punks, prefer to be polite.  It's usually, at this point in career, tour, and evening, a question of energy conservation.


He is bored - a danger - and physically trapped.  A discomfort. And absolutely exhausted.  Most people have no idea how tiring hosting intimate parties for thousands of strangers every night can be.  It builds.  It gets to you.   Half the world would kill to be seen with him, to talk with him, to be him.   And he is on the verge of an existential moment. He no longer gives a god damn, and perhaps cannot believe he ever really did.  


He is, oh, twenty-four years of age.....


Really, this guy who looks like a prep school physics master in coat and tie was a big star. 




Eleven years after his death, twenty-one after they last sang a song together,

over forty years after he left the group,

 why to history

is The Kingston Trio still

Dave Guard

and the Other Guys

An revisionist inquiry into fame, relevance,

 and an accurate accounting in American pop music history


You, of course, don't even remember Dave Guard.  Don't pretend you do.  He was the leader of The Kingston Trio from 1957 to 1961.


           You don't remember the Kingston Trio either, even if you are old enough to have then enjoyed them.  The Trio was really all there was in the pop music business for four years, excelling in all fields, some of which they essentially invented.


How big were they?  Cutting to the chase, Capitol Records admits that the KT provided about (quotes vary) ten to forty percent of the company's income during their prime; this with Frank Sinatra and Nat King Cole on the roster on the decade cusp between the 1950's and 60's. Not until the Beatles, another Capitol group, would another act have four albums in the Top Ten at the same time. In fact, except for these two groups, nobody - even with the niche record market today - has ever replicated that. Nobody.

Text Box:

As is traditional in America, all this is forgotten now, especially by those who profited, but there you go.......


It has sometimes been a difficult half century, almost, for Robert Castle Schoen - Bob Shane - of the Kingston Trio.  The best singer of the group, and one of the best of his pop music generation, he carried the melody on the vast majority of Kingston Trio tunes, and sang the lead on its biggest hits.  He still does; the Kingston Trio has been a professional act for forty-five years, and Shane has always been part of it.  His fast and powerful strumming of his Martin D-28 provides the rhythmic anchor for the instrumental backup.  His is the featured voice, the "mossy rock on which the church was built."  He is the Kingston Trio.


Although periodically criticized for his seemingly simple strumming - heavily influenced by his native Hawaiian pop music – Shane subtly warped the public’s appreciation of what ‘authentic’ American folk music sounded like.  He also helped popularize many now standard tunes for the first time (such was the power of the Kingston Trio in their prime, they didn’t have to be hits…merely sung by the KT), covered the works of young, soon to be famous songwriters, and kept his group successful through several sharp blows.  It was his deceptively wide-ranged whiskey voice that gave the group its distinctive sound, almost making it irrelevant who else sang beside him.  He was also, according to the obsequious press of the time, considered the best-looking one in the group - "Our sex symbol," according to his mates in those pre-Paul and British invasion days of Tiger Beat magazine's pinnacle of popularity - and as good an all-around entertainer as many far more famous.


Given that the Kingston Trio was – really - the first super-group, the first of the big California sound recording bands, the act who actually developed the college concert tour, the concert album, the very concept of the long-play album itself; the act that played a passive but major role in the development of high fidelity recording technique in the early days of stereo; the group who made the acoustic guitar and banjo both cool and profitable to make (orders were backed up for two and one half years at C. F. Martin at one point....) - never mind play for a living - the group that broke open the folk and faux bluegrass boom, leading to the plethora of middle class singer/songwriters with us yet; the group that could headline Vegas or nightclub as well as auditorium concert with single and album both at number one nationally; the group that rewrote the relationship between manager and act too late to save Elvis but in time to change the industry; the group so metaphorically blessed they could walk away from their own plane crash a month and not so far from where American Pie dropped from the sky and do a memorable concert at the University of Notre Dame within hours. 


This was a group with a work ethic to shame dot.commers, given that they put out three albums a year and still performed two hundred and fifty shows around television and radio shots.  An act whose influence was such that three subsequent generations unknowingly play Appalachian ballads to Hawaiian rhythms and feel 'authentic' in so doing. A group whose public confidence and social ease was so strong that it immediately became a cliche and is still shaping - admitted or not - the stage presence and delivery and harmonies of entrants into the age of rap, and – as noted -  the only American group to have four separate albums in the top ten at the same time …. and for a prolonged period at that…. you would think that Shane, as the only member throughout, would be drowning in the respect of peers with the satisfaction of a job well done.  He has had surprisingly little of either. 


He is haunted, as he has been for forty years, by that ghost of his original band mate.  The Kingston Trio has remained in the collective mind of an ever diminishing but devoted public a group that still belongs, somehow, to Dave Guard, its nominal original leader, who died in 1991 thirty years after he left in an acrimonious departure.   Which is to say, a partner in a musical association for only four years and gone forty still receives most of the credit for the group's fame.  It drives Shane, justifiably, bonkers.


The reasons for this are both complex and perhaps rather obvious, and because the process reflects so accurately on how all history is recorded - even in this relatively trivial genre - it ought to be considered before delving into weightier subjects.


In the early days of the Kingston Trio, say 1957, responsibilities were divided up between transportation, clothing, and music. Guard was music, and he kept at it because he cared and because it interested him and…because it kept him in charge to a degree.  He would run the rehearsals.  But there was another reason for the leadership image.  


Text Box:  Guard was the tallest in the group, about six foot four, and he played, along with the guitar, the long-neck Vega banjo.  (By the by, he signed left-handed and played both instruments right handed.  Think about that.....)  He was often posed center in their photographs, especially the ones on the album covers, Shane - an inch or so shorter - to his right, and Nick Reynolds (the "runt of the litter" at five foot eight) on his left.  They were always a visually attractive ensemble given the favorable height distinctions which, among other things, made for several natural camera shots of the group when singing.  The visual effect was powerful and subtle; it furthered the impression given by each member playing several different instruments (four or five types of guitars, two types of banjos, bouzouki, and various percussion instruments, plus a bassist as sideman) in the course of a concert that each of the three brought unique strengths to the group - had a role - and the whole was far more impressive than the individuals involved.  Subtle and true.


Although lead singing duties alternated, and all three shared introductions and time at the center microphone (actually, back then, there was often only one microphone, which makes Shane's position to stage left odd, given his melodic responsibility, and emphasizes the importance given to the visual impact by their manager and partner, Frank Werber), Guard was looked upon by camera, public, and - at least for publicity - his cohorts as the leader, the visual focal point.  He wrote some pretty good songs, something for which he is seldom given sufficient credit.  He also was the most versatile musician, although nobody has claimed him a genius of the fret board on any instrument.  He learned quickly and became professionally adequate at many things, and was given undeserved credit for certain tonal quirks that might more rightfully belong to album producer Voyle Gilmore, sideman Buck Wheat or, better perhaps, mere favorable coincidence of the Trio's tapes being mastered in the natural cavern of Capitol Records.  In any case, the ringing sound of the Trio's albums was something sought but never achieved by other groups and the Trio itself when it changed record companies without Guard. 


Dave Guard continually studied music - he said - but his playing remained that of a gifted self-taught amateur impatient for sounds.  He rarely seems to have used finger picks playing banjo with the Trio, and the brightly muffled notes of his large and powerful fingers plucking the strings in sometimes odd progressions are inimitable to this day - especially given that he was trying to duplicate Scruggs-style picking without, really, knowing how to do it.  (If you don't believe me, try to play his banjo part to "You're Gonna Miss Me" from Goin' Places, his last album with the Kingston Trio in 1961) He was also the only banjoist to frail and pick within the same song, sometimes with stunning beauty.  The Coast of California is one of the most haunting songs in the vast Trio library.  He never actually mastered the forward roll, though, the hinge to the great banjo players of today during his recordings with the Trio. (In Run, Molly, Run, a Bill Monroe bluegrass standard, Earl Scrugg's innovative drive is severely missed).  But like I say, Guard was playing right handed, and he was a southpaw. Few people are capable of learning an instrument from beginner level to professional while recording best-selling albums and during sold out tours, developing an original style and bring such enthusiasm to it that national sales figures indicate entire audiences apparently left shows to purchase banjos of their own.    


So with full and due credit to Pete Seeger, who frailed and double-thumbed the instrument's neglected and fascinating history, and the great Earl Scruggs, the genius who essentially reinvented it to the bluegrass lead for which most know it today, we need to realize that nobody did more to popularize the banjo - and to suggest the directions it might go within popular music - than Donald David Guard.  Nobody.


Apologies, Mr. Seeger; you were never that popular.  Sorry, Bela Fleck.  You might be playing accordion if not for Dave Guard.  And sorry, Earl.  Just as your band had the misfortune to follow the Kingston Trio at the Newport Folk Festival - and the crowd wouldn't let the Trio off and you on till Guard spoke to them, telling them you were his favorite banjoist - you never would have crossed over without him, so kiss goodbye to Warren Beatty and the Bonnie and Clyde soundtrack. Without the KT, it's possible Beatty might never have heard a picked banjo, an event without which "Foggy Mountain Breakdown" remains a Nashville favorite and only a Nashville favorite.  Oh, and Nashville remains just Nashville, the capital of Tennessee where they play country music, we're told.  For some reason, nobody provided a crossover hit when it was needed back in the late 1950's.........


The Kingston Trio, formed in 1957, famous in 1958, was presented as three sanitized frat boys singing sweet songs in sweet harmony.  Emphasis was put on the fact that they were students (safe for role model status in the 1950's swimming with Juvenile Delinquent wannabes in and out of Pop music) and successful students at that. Their business degrees were given favorable attention. Of course, Shane and Reynolds graduated from Menlo Business College after, at least in Reynolds' case, 'changing' colleges.  But Guard graduated on scholarship from Stanford University, then as now an intellectual paragon for intellectual paragons.  While there he was a star athlete, a quarterback on a pretty good team. Long before it was a cliche, he was into martial arts and meditation.  Before the Trio, he was an actual Beatnik, with goatee and sandals.  He continued academic pursuits all his life.  He was in graduate school when the Trio was formed.


He was, long before the Beach Boys and Eagles, a prototypical California Golden Boy (although he was, like Shane, his childhood friend, from Hawaii…).  He was a famous and highly regarded man by the time he left the Trio at age twenty-seven. He then contributed the major part to an Oscar-winning soundtrack to a movie, How The West Was Won.  This kid, with the requisite beautiful and talented wife and adorable children, and three hundred thousand dollars severance from the Trio (over a million in today's bills and a virtually unheard of amount of show business severance back then…) had it all, at which point he left for Australia.  Which is to say, like Garbo, he disappeared from recorded history in a blaze of glory, dignity and intact artistic credentials, willingly kissing fame and shallowness adios. 


Given all that, how did the twice-divorced Guard, after accomplishing very little in the interim to remotely compare to the Kingston Trio, die in New Hampshire thirty years later, apparently living with friends and admirers, reduced to being Dave-Guard-once-of-the-Kingston-Trio, an entity that Shane alone has kept afloat for all but five years since the original group, less Guard, officially dissolved in 1967? And despite that, how does his four year presence in the group usurp in official and popular memory the six years of his successor, John Stewart (a better guitarist and songwriter, adequate if less inventive banjoist, a singer seemingly always caught in the wrong key, a strong stage presence and even odder, if sometimes hysterical, M.C.)?   And how do both configurations overpower all the Kingston Trio's since 1967, even though they have featured outstanding entertainers and instrumentalists alongside Shane? What does Bob Shane have to do to get the public to agree with his long time mantra: Listen!  The Kingston Trio is better now than it ever was.  Especially when Shane is not, anymore, Text Box:  
Guard and Shane 
the best singer on stage, winded and scratchy but leather lunged as ever.  He is sixty-seven, after all, the same age Guard would have been.


It is possible that neither Shane nor Guard really understood the popularity of the Kingston Trio and that both their explanations, which conflict and changed somewhat, are inaccurate in and of themselves.  Guard's story – one of his stories - is that he left because of theft of his songwriting royalties, and that neither Shane nor Nick Reynolds wanted to practice or get better but viewed their success as a group personality driven thing, not a musical one.  Guard, who was - by far - the dominant stage personality, ironically missed all that and thought - or periodically said he thought - it was a combination of things but mostly the music.  He kept trying to musically improve beyond the norm and impress upon his colleagues their duty to do so as well, implying it was necessary to justify their success. That they owed it to the fans, and only a sensitive artistic type - like, oh, himself, for example - could truly appreciate this noblesse oblige.   They, the beer swilling, adulterous frat boys, didn't, and he couldn't stand to stay artistically stagnant.   That's the story.


This would be touching and more substantial if the three were equally successful as singers.  Generally unremarked, Guard was the only one of the four principle Trio performers who never sang lead on a hit song.  John Stewart, who replaced him, had several hits with the Trio, and several beyond it. Reynolds was the singer for "MTA" and "Bad Man's Blunder" and Shane was "Tom Dooley" and "Scotch and Soda" and the others. Guard maintained in later years that he sacrificed his voice for the good of the group because Shane couldn't figure out harmony and Reynolds had limited skills (both absurd contentions), so Guard sometimes sang both the highest and lowest parts, bass and falsetto, in the course of a single song or chorus to cover up this deficiency. That he sometimes did these things is on the tapes, although not on the early records, but the reasons may be different.  He later mumbled that the public never actually heard his real voice, since it was always strained by the harmony singing when his verses wheeled around.  Yes and no. 


There is no question that the harmony arrangements on many Trio songs are lazy, especially when compared to the work of their contemporaries and rivals The Limeliters, Chad Mitchell Trio, and Peter Paul and Mary.  But none of them had the popularity of the Trio in its prime.  In the studio, producer Voyle Gilmore would double up the chorus parts to give it oomph, but it also had the effect of implying three parts when there were often only two, one sung in different octaves by two people. Guard never found the third part on some of these songs, which sometimes were quite easy and not necessitating long searches.  Even I, a nobody and not fit to tune the Trio's instruments, am able to do it and did do it for a living as, partly, a KT tribute band. And no, I don't buy the artistic choice route.


The Trio, as a unit, was quite capable of boilerplate presentation: Shane on melody, Reynolds sliding between parts above him, and the unfortunate third flailing beneath, generally ending up singing something close to Reynolds' part an octave down.


In further detriment to Guard's position, in their first album many of the twelve songs are done in perfect three-part harmony.  The Kingston Trio did sometimes provide lovely singing, of making truly moving work with simple but inspired instrumentation.  They were quite capable of great moments.  The pure three parts on Gue, Gue and Across the Wide Missouri still touch the heart, Everglades (where Guard's vocal versatility made a real mark, making it eerie as an approaching thunderstorm), and their Christmas album, which is both a cult classic and one of the best ever made.  But Guard's theory - excuse, rather - holds no water.  He sang lead on several songs including Remember the Alamo, with Shane doing a high harmony, and Guard's voice is not notably strained.  He had solo outings on every album - odd song choices, for the most part - and they are pleasant but not great works.  He never improved upon Fast Freight, a song from the first album, where his rich, naturally light baritone shines.


 It may be, as a singer, that Guard simply just didn't have the magic.  He wasn't anywhere near the great singer his partner Shane became during Guard's tenure.  It is most likely that the conflict in the Kingston Trio was engendered because he felt the leader role - image, actually - slipping from him, because he was no longer the best, the star (as he had been in the Ur-Trio, Dave Guard and the Calypsonians) and that despite all the talk it was Shane who was improving by bounds as a vocalist, while Guard never did.  Worse, his playing - while decidedly of more interest than Shane's - may not have been as exciting to the audience as Reynold's periodic percussion chores.  Of course, he was the dominant personality on stage, helped by his size and acknowledged quick wit, and the Trio worked as a unit supporting each other.  But could it be that all the convolutions of intricate arrangement - or discussions about such - were simply to cover up a growing sense of unimportance, of realization that he wasn't ever going to be a great instrumentalist or singer.  That really, he was disposable to the Trio, because the key sound was Shane and Reynolds, with Guard filling in as needed?


Text Box:  
Easy to hate......

There is more.  When the Kingston Trio was asked to sing at the Inauguration of Democrat John Kennedy in 1960, Guard canned it, as was the agreed upon right within the group. Guard was reportedly then a Republican.  That was arrogance, pure and simple.  You simply, as a citizen of 1960's America, and maybe not even today, do not do such a thing without great and pointless insult being taken.  You are, after all, saying the taste of the electorate bites, and the electorate was the Trio's audience.  (The Trio went out of their way to laud Kennedy in song later, and sang at the White House of Lyndon Johnson.) When the man Kennedy beat, Richard Nixon, was elected in 1968, the Trio was neither in existence nor missed (or probably known of) by the man Guard apparently favored.


And when John Wayne was trying to find a hit song for the soundtrack of his movie The Alamo in 1959, the Kingston Trio submitted one (the aforementioned "Remember the Alamo" written by Guard and Jane Bowers.  Guard sang lead…).  But the selected track was "The Green Leaves of Summer" which was offered to the Trio.  Guard apparently rejected it, likely because they had rejected his effort (which, in any case, attempted a slavish devotion to Texan myth and, in the course of events, was too too for even a Wayne movie and - even though the venerable Johnny Cash covered it later - historic nonsense).  “Summer” was given to rival band The Brothers Four and was a monster hit. 


This can be patted into the shape of allegiance to personal principle and artistic sacrifice, but it doesn't resonate that way.  You can hear it in Guard’s voice at the end of not excessive applause after singing “Remember the Alamo” in the recording of the 1959 Newport Folk Festival as he says, almost sarcastically, “thank you” over and around screamed requests for songs Bob Shane sang.  It was excessive vanity, an actual delusion that even the Beatles, for example, never had.  Guard apparently felt the Kingston Trio could insult the President and turn down a likely hit song with a built-in profit generator in a Wayne movie.  They were more important than others, and Dave Guard was the most important person in this most important outfit.  And people had better start noticing that.


         Paul McCartney and John Lennon never made such errors; they cheerfully played for the Queen, and Lennon - likely the personality least impressed with Royalty and as insecure around a certain partner as Guard - inoffensively suggested everyone could rattle their jewelry in time. 


          But Dave Guard never, somehow, touched on any of this in his recollections of those years - we are offered only his artistic sacrifices and airy graces.


The Trio seethed.  Shane and Reynolds did not show up for a fashion shoot in Tahiti, apparently something of importance to Guard, evidence he had managed to royally piss off both his partners and their equal manager Frank Werber by a maintained combination of arrogance, condescension, and rude, biting put downs.


Whatever the fuelling motivation, he also did something very foolish and suicidal.  Starting around 1960, he started to badmouth his mates to the press, complaining about their lack of chops and training. They did not, then, retaliate in the public venue.  If he was trying to influence them, or cow them, it failed.  Long after, in an interview in the 1970's, he explained that they never understood the benefits of study, never having done any in school and all.  This sounds, and is, petulant and petty.  And once started down that road, Guard had to escalate or admit it for what it was. 


Influenced by decided financial irregularities within the mighty business machine of The Kingston Trio, including outright theft, he eventually threatened to quit, allowing as how he would play out all obligations until they could replace him.  It is to be wondered if he really thought they would crumble, that he was irreplaceable, the key part, the essence of the Trio.  It seems now a play for acknowledgement and power, and it pointlessly cost him the long time friendship of a man known for fidelity to his friends: Bob Shane.  Shane and Guard had met as teens in Hawaii, and started music together.  Shane, in fact, initially taught Guard how to play guitar.  While apparently never the close friends the press suggested they had been, when Guard opened his big mouth, the hurt and anger Shane felt then riles him yet. 


All of Shane's unforgiving deportment regarding Guard can, perhaps, be traced to his feeling of betrayal by a supposed brother in arms to the press, more than the opinion itself.  A partner who never, ever apologized for being what evidence suggests was the Lord Sphincter of his time.  Coupled with the introspective genius, perhaps Guard was simply in love with his own image.


 Although minor variations of this tale would be played out with other groups over the next forty years, the breakup of the Kingston Trio was the Vietnam of the tabloid pop music wars: the first played out in public, and a rigid template for replication.  No other act - and at a hitherto unheard of height of fame and power - had so publicly disintegrated.   No aspect that accompanied the Beatles’, Temptations’, or Beach Boys' feuds, Fleetwood Mac's or the Eagles' partings would be absent from the rift between Guard and his former band. 


Text Box:  
Stewart, Reynolds, Shane 1961

In any case, Guard did not cow either of his band mates or their manager, the wily Frank Werber.  They all probably hated him by then.  In September of 1961, John Stewart replaced Dave Guard.


Werber was apparently so relieved to be rid of Guard he stepped past hyperbole in discussing Stewart's attributes to the press and into something akin to dementia when describing the young man's qualities.  Stewart was announced as "handsome," a phrase apparently not to be applied to Guard, although Stewart was so thin and devoid of any visible muscle mass that he was an image reversal of the solid, athletic Guard. Werber went on to describe Stewart as a better banjo player (the banjo is a deceptive instrument, and Stewart could fool people rather cleverly with very fast picking with his right hand.  He could not - cannot - frail or do a sustained, fast forward roll and in any long solo requiring picking he gave every indication of cramping up...), but Stewart didn't have Guard's sense of instrumental exploration - and he could be extremely sloppy. Werber said he had a better voice. True only if a liquid, thready, adenoidinal delivery is your thing; Oh Willow Waley will prompt any listener to hawk phlegm and stifle a gag reflex - but, like Guard, the lazy arrangements demanded he had to sing way high or low to find the third part.  When he became a solo in 1967, Stewart sounded both much better and way different in his natural low baritone, testament both to age and to the fact that vocal sacrifice was the lot of the third voice in the Kingston Trio.


Werber also mentioned that Stewart was tall and "fit the image." Werber was aware of the aesthetics. He was less aware that Stewart did not - could not - successfully fill the intellectual image that Guard gave the Trio.  Guard may have been a know-it-all, but he projected a commanding self assurance that kept audiences rapt.  He looked and sounded like an intellectual, because - with all the good and bad, product and pretense - he was.  The audience kind of believed he really did know it all.  And they liked that.  It was very reassuring in the age of the bomb for adults to see such competence and soothing, unthreatening intelligence in the young; for the young, it was thrilling to see such normal-seeming adults be so cool - and acknowledged as such by, for a time, everyone.  Absolutely everyone.  


It had never happened before in entertainment, and it has never happened since, that the Pop and the Cool were one, however briefly.  The Kingston Trio, establishment and gentle rebels both. There are no comparisons, really, that suggest how powerful was the Kingston Trio's cultural influence in its day, with Dave Guard at the helm.  But in the autumn of 1961, he left.

Text Box:   

Guard started a new group, Dave Guard and the Whiskeyhill Singers.


The new group included David "Buck" Wheat, the bass player of the Kingston Trio for three years, who finished up with the Trio under what must have been strained circumstances, given that he threw his allegiance to Guard with whom he shared a certain educated wit.  Wheat was credited with breaking up the Trio by Lou Gottlieb, who considered Wheat something of an evil influence on three somewhat naïve college age performers. (Gottlieb, a doctor in music, leader of the rival Limeliters, and a bass player of note himself, may have had it in for Wheat.) Wheat was an imaginative and tasteful musician - a jazz player - who did guitar and percussion work on the Trio's albums (uncredited, and Guard was assumed to have played some guitar leads - by me if no one else - of which he was then incapable) and who may, being musically bored, have fed Guard's sense of musical entitlement in order to satisfy both their professional wants.  Buck Wheat was also an inspired inventor of musical instruments (tuned congas and bongos, called goombas) which the Trio used.  He also may have been the conduit between Guard and marijuana ("He knew where to get it," said Guard).  The cover of the Singers' one and only album shows Guard and Wheat looking, without too much question, either very near sighted, which they were, or very stoned, which they could have been.  Several songs inside do little to change that opinion.  The group either bombed (Bob Shane), or was terribly successful in person but was too exhausting (Dave Guard).  They lasted about six months.


The group also included Judy Henske, a real talent and powerhouse of a singer, and Cyrus Faryar, who looked like a younger and smaller Bob Shane, and who had a pleasant if nondescript voice.  Wheat bleated rather than sang, although all could read music and hit the notes as written.  Guard did the arrangements.


It is interesting to note that both Guard and the Trio tried to visually replace each other in their respective groups, Guard by hiring Faryar, the KT by hiring the tall, but-not-as-tall-as-Guard John Stewart. All of Guard's replacements got progressively shorter.


Why the Whiskeyhill Singers broke up after only one album but an Oscar winning soundtrack for How the West Was Won was variously explained by Guard as himself fulfilling contractual obligations to Capitol Records, the group's inability to get a hit sound, Capitol's lack of support, and his lack of interest in being famous. Immediately after, he took his family to Australia to live, leaving a second album in the can, unreleased. This doesn't ring right, even given his new group's surprisingly lukewarm reception. 


And Shane had a different explanation altogether.  Well, two actually.  The first was a precise encapsulation of Guard's personality as Shane knew it: "he's an ass."  But in 1972, when with the New Kingston Trio, he told my wife and me the real reason was that Guard found out that Shane had slept with, well, someone, a revelation that drove Guard up the wall. This was, in the course of that conversation, a 'moonplop' - Guard's word for someone talking during a ballad - only remotely related and unnecessary for the continuance of that discussion. Shane was married then and was at the time of the alleged affair - but it rings somewhat true.  There was a hissy fit aspect to Guard's actions. 

Text Box:  Once good friends.......1981 Reunion Show on PBS

There was also a sort of gleeful revenge to Shane in the telling, bespeaking an unpleasant personal side.  Pursuing that story may reveal, at some point, the reason for Shane's seeming lack of respect among his peers.  Certainly, his drinking (he has described himself as an alcoholic at fifteen, and in person he recalls all stigmata of the high functioning alcoholic) created several unpleasant episodes in his career. In any case, when Shane made the revelation to us, he reacted immediately to my wife's startled look with a sliding away from the issue, worrying he may only have burnished Guard's image brighter to his own detriment.  It wasn't enough just to prove Guard wrong about the Trio, he had to denigrate him by an intrusion into his professional and personal world.  The professional oblivion of Guard wasn't enough, the continued success of the Trio under his sole leadership wasn't enough.  Forty years later, it still isn't.


I have no idea if Shane’s story is true.


When PBS and others finally hit upon getting all the members of the Trio together in 1981 for a reunion, they brought back Guard, Reynolds, and Stewart and the then-extant Trio of Shane, Roger Gambill and George Grove, got Mary Travers and Tom Smothers to host, Lyndsey Buckingham - a major fan and then at the height of his own fame with Fleetwood Mac - to play bass, and filmed the 'reunion' at a California theme park.  To everyone's surprise, it was not a huge success.  Ticket sales were only enough for a two thirds full audience, according to the Wall St. Journal.  Guard came with weird instruments and wanted to redo "Tom Dooley" (Reynolds claimed that he wanted to make it a 'nineteen chord' song. It normally has two…) for the show.


 They only did three songs as a trio, and Shane never surrendered the center position. It looked, sounded, and felt weird. It also looked and felt hostile. Tommy Smothers, who hosted, said Shane had been four hours late for sound check, reflecting - at best - an ambivalent attitude towards the whole thing, or an attempt to unnerve his former partners.  Guard and Shane had almost no interaction throughout the entire evening, and Reynolds gabbed incessantly to cover the fact.  Stewart, who also had bitched about his position in the Trio through the years, mostly about money, had a much warmer reception from his two band mates.


Where to begin.  It is hard to believe that even the most diehard fan, someone who bought every album from the first ten years, could view the reText Box:  
The Reunion 1981

union and not be appalled. Me, for instance.  To start with, the sound mix was too god-awful for comment. This could have been due to Guard not being used to on-stage monitor speakers (the equalizers necessary for their use were not invented till the Trio was gone), or to Shane's warm and appreciative early comment to the soundman during the sound check, "Get it right this time or go fish.  I mean it." 


It was apparent that the original Trio hadn't rehearsed sufficiently, if at all, since everyone searched for long forgotten parts.  Guard flubbed his banjo solo in "Hard Ain't it Hard" (a delight that the always devoted John Stewart repeated during his solo in "Reuben James", both songs of Woody Guthrie) and the enmasse group arrangements were to be compared with any camp sing along book.  And Guard was over the top, singing weird and inappropriate parts that sounded worse for the mix.  He gave one long introduction which was totally cut from the tape, and his vocals made him sound like an over eager amateur brought up on stage with the big boys. In a way - since he probably hadn't performed in front of a large audience in years - that was indeed the case, although absolutely nobody that night except Lindsey Buckingham and John Stewart sounded sharp.  The Stewart version of the Trio was by far the best, and Stewart's solo outings the best music and performances. 


Tommy Smothers was simultaneously rude, idiotic, and unintentionally disrespectful, while repeatedly claiming to be otherwise. Worse: he wasn't funny, worshipful audience response to the contrary, and was every entertainer's worst nightmare: doing old bits word for word.[1]  Grove is an uninspiring singer at best, and he lived down to that accolade.  Roger Gamble could be terrific, but it was as though he played dazed on this night.  Mary Travers bleated, and sometimes she and Gamble were the only singers to be distinguished from the pack singing high, slightly grating notes.  A lot of the tape is just noise.       


Later, but before the show was broadcast, Guard was asked about the reunion.  He said, truthfully, regarding those looking to see the old Trio, "I think they'll be disappointed, the show was more of a promotion for the Kingston Trio that's performing these days."  Irony, there, surely.


"That's exactly what it was, and if he doesn't like it, it's tough," responded Bob Shane in the Wall Street Journal article covering the event. "Dave Guard sold his interest in the Kingston Trio for cash money--$300,000--and I'm not going to feel sorry for him.  I don't enjoy singing with him; I don't enjoy his voice."   You can almost hear him saying to himself  "Bob, shut your damned mouth…why, why, why did I say that?….."   Rather, you really want to hear him say that.  He didn't.  Thus died any real hope of reassembling the original Kingston Trio.  If anyone had cared.  The reality is, the show was awful, the new Trio didn't sound good, look good, or connect with the audience.  As bad as the older trios were that night, the audience loved them.


 Why would Shane, even if he felt that way, say such a thing to a major paper and kill the good feelings that would have made the event more successful in tape sales and, well, perhaps giving a boost in ticket sales to his then current line-up, his supposed point to the whole thing? Shane can sometimes be remarkably inarticulate, but he is very far from stupid.  Most likely, Guard's superior attitude and favorable notices for little accomplishment have mystified and angered him beyond comprehension. Perhaps he was still bristling from these comments from Guard printed in a book called When Rock Was Young a year or so before.. 


"I saw Bobby in 1975," says Dave. "He wanted me to join the group, but I didn't like that particular configuration that he had. They were a bunch of sleazy cats; it was just like gang-bang humor, with a lot of drinking on stage and stuff like that. But since then, the guy who took the job I would have had is very good, and Bobby has cleaned up his act pretty well, so it sounds almost respectable now. He learned the hard way. He tried to do it real sloppy, and then he turned around and cleaned it up."


Elsewhere, actually, Guard was quoted as saying the new band made him 'physically ill,' and while Reynolds and Werber apparently shared that view, they were at least more circumspect; at that time, after all, they were still part owners of the Kingston Trio name, and it was worth something.


Um.  Well, thanks, Dave.  Meanwhile, what the hell have you been doing, deadbeat.....


Now, from Shane's view, after enduring the condescending slams from one former member and weathering the complaints of the second and his former manager, another question must have arisen: why would someone interview Dave Guard about the Kingston Trio, a group he was in for only four years and, at that time, out of for almost twenty?  Why does it never seem to occur to anyone to interview the guy who has always been the main singer and the only one who has always been there for all the hit records? (Even today, former member John Stewart seems to be interviewed more than Shane about the Trio…) And why the hell would Guard, even if he felt that way about the Kingston Trio at that point, say something so offensive and condescending about his former band? And, if Shane would say, only six years later, how much he dislikes Guard's singing, why did he ask him to rejoin in 1975?  And why would Guard apparently consider it, given the reasons he says he left and the attitude of the new, acknowledged 'leader.'   Did Shane ask Guard to rejoin, or was that the lucubration of a former star on the skids?


Logically, it would seem incredible that Shane would have wanted Guard again.  He had access to better singers and musicians and, since he had made the commitment to being an oldies band, why hire someone who had dedicated his life to restructure Tom Dooley to sound as if Miles Davis had written it?   The easy answer is that with Guard back, Shane might be able to entice Reynolds, then in retirement, and have a marketable item there: the original unit. The intangible answer is that Shane is a good friend and apparently has deep and lasting affections about the original Trio and his youth.  Go figure.  Whatever he then thought about this condescending gasbag, Dave Guard was once and would always be at some level a friend and you do things for friends. And by 1975, Guard was heading down if not actually on the skids.  His marriage was in trouble, among other things. He was rumored to be experimenting with harder drugs.  He was involved with a guru.  Getting into "philosophy."  An observer called it "what-does-it-all-mean-itis," but there are more accurate descriptions for depression.


Shane actually does do many good things for friends.   He is faithful to them, and even in my brief contacts with him - and he would never recall me - he is resolutely polite and kind.  But he also inspires anger, annoyance, despair, exasperation in his band mates.  Roger Gambill, then a Trio member, worked himself into a frenzy one night in Atlanta in 1976 after I told him Shane had once mentioned retiring to the islands and opening an authentic Hawaiian restaurant.  "Ah wish he woooould," crooned Gambill, looking blissfully off into the middle distance at the prospect. "Ah truly do."  He looked back at me in mock seriousness. "Did he give you a date?" He was mostly kidding.  Everyone laughed uncomfortably.


But there has always been a sense that the Trio should be a lot better, musically, than it is, and that the logjam is Shane who refuses to change, possibly because of the drinking, possibly out of a conscious fat-headedness, a sense of entitlement. This is uncomfortably close - well, dead on - with Guard's stated viewpoint forty years ago.  I suspect it is seldom a broached topic, but there are many who hover around the Kingston Trio waiting for the name to become available to bring their own vision to it.  It is now solely owned by Bob Shane.   


After re-establishing the Trio in the early 1970's, first as The New Kingston Trio and then under pressure (because of the show's adult content, mostly) buying out the name from Werber and Reynolds, Shane had originally decided on Bill Zorn, a good and versatile singer and excellent banjo player (who has now replaced the late Lou Gottlieb in The Limeliters), and Gambill, probably the best singer and entertainer ever in the Kingston Trio.  Contrary to some opinion, these were not hired simply as sidemen to Shane. Shane is aware of his deficiencies, and he knows he shines best in a group with harmony.  Zorn and Gambill were presented to the audience as equal members, and Shane was devoutly faithful to them.


A powerful tenor, a funny and southern gentleman, Gambill took the spot of Nick Reynolds, then raising Christmas trees in Oregon.   Gambill could, for example, sing the Star Spangled Banner well, and did so at professional athletic events, something none of the original Trio would, could, or should have even attempted.  Zorn left after a few years, replaced by the current banjoist George Grove.  Shane probably had hopes of rising again with the new outfit and restored name, and bookings and recordings returning him to the charts.  But in 1985, four years after the Reunion, with no warning, the well-beloved Roger Gambill died.  His death was a genuine shock to everyone.  He was only forty-four. 


It is fair to mention here that the group Guard saw in 1975 must have been with Zorn and Gambill?  With Shane they did drink on stage, sometimes a lot, and the Trio was doing raunchy humor, a habit not entirely exorcised to this day.  There were plusses.  Raunchy but very funny, and Bill Zorn had a huge range - bass to second tenor - to go with his instrumental excellence, and Gambill was also a natural comedian and story teller in the grand Southern tradition, something Guard was not, and he was musically versatile - gifted, actually.  He was much funnier than Guard, who did not actually pretend to be a comedian, rather more of a host.  As a technical musician, Guard was hardly fit to string Zorn's banjo. 


When he looked upon the Trio that night, Guard may have been and likely was offended by the humor, but he could also see his worse nightmare: the new Trio was better technically, if less inventive and no longer stretching. He could also see why Shane did not long for his return.  And he also may have feared that if he came back, the Trio would not be as good as it currently was.  Whatever stage dignity Guard could have and would have provided, he must have known the comparisons would be drawn, no longer from fading, respectful memories, but from current comparisons.  And he could lose out.  After all, nobody requests songs from an oldies band that aren't hits, and Guard never sang lead on a hit.  And the thought of playing Tom Dooley every night with those two stupid chords……..


Dave Guard provided a touching tribute to Roger Gambill on a memorial website.  It labors in memory next to his other quote about the Trio of which Gambill was then a member.  It must be said that Guard leaves an unpleasant taste, sometimes.  Overbearing in charge, obsequious in defeat.  This may be terribly unfair, but the quotes are there (although Guard may never have envisioned them appearing on the Internet since there was no Internet to aid that prospect in 1985), and the image was in place when he had time and ability to adjust it.  That he didn't speaks to the issue.


Even more difficult is seeing Guard doing the hits of the John Stewart era: Reverend Mr. Black, for one. The Kingston Trio started out having fun with folk and country music.  Then, with Stewart, they started doing them for real.  For Guard, truth be told, that would be slumming.  One doesn't slum.


Text Box: Dave Guard and the Calypsonians
Dave Guard and the Calypsonians 1

Even when the Trio returned to prominence with Stewart, there was the asterisk in everyone's mind just like Roger Maris had the same year of 1961.  Not as good as Guard, but okay.   For Guard to return to the KT in 1975, it would be like Babe Ruth returning to the 1961 Yankees behind Mantle and Maris, batting .156 with nothing longer than a single.  The legend, whether or not ever deserved, would be gone.


Dave Guard had created an image he could not recall or recast, because it was insidious and subtle and locked in the minds of a generation no longer buying the records.  He had the reputation of being the funny man, the intellect, the best musician - the one with ethereal, artistic abilities - and the irreplaceable cog in a delicate machine.  With Roger Gambill in Bob Shane's group, Dave Guard would neither be the leader, the best musician, the funniest, the best singer, or much of a memory since he never sang lead on the hits. He was only the image of those traits.   


To fulfill obligations in 1985, Shane hired Bob Haworth while Gambill, who had suffered a series of heart attacks and strokes, was still on his deathbed. Haworth had a sort of pedigree, replacing a replacement in The Brothers Four.  He had a solo act.  He was energetic.  He was an adequate musician.  He is rather annoyingly vain.  He also often sings flat on the high notes and can visibly cringe an audience.  But he bailed out Shane at a crisis, and Shane remains grateful.  When Nick Reynolds rejoined the Trio, replacing Haworth, Shane continued to be grateful.  When Reynolds re-retired in 1998, Haworth got the call again.  The current Trio is Shane, Grove, and Haworth.  I have not heard them.  Shane hears them every night.  I wonder if he still claims them to be better than ever with Haworth curdling water in his ear?  Nonetheless, Haworth's presence in the Kingston Trio is vivid testimony to Shane's gratitude.  Or, maybe he actually feels that it doesn't matter who sings with him.


Text Box:  
Grove, Shane, Haworth

Either way, the visual effect of the Kingston Trio, rarely mentioned, is long gone today.  A recent promo photo with Grove holding a long neck banjo only emphasizes the problem. It simply looks stupid and outsized. Haworth has recently switched, apparently, to the four string tenor guitar like Reynolds used.  Only George Grove changes instruments in concert anymore, something they all used to do in the glory days, but he is short and bald and generally plays a standard neck banjo - damned well (he and Zorn have been the best instrumentalists in the Trio proper, ever) - but it isn't the same, somehow.  When Stewart replaced Guard, he was tall enough to fill Guard's visual role with the long necked banjo, and the image remained under Werber till the original lineup went away in 1967.  It has never made an appearance since. 


 The current Kingston Trio is a self-parody, although often an entertaining one. Shane's new partners have the annoying habit of seeming to expect the respect due Reynolds, Guard, or Stewart based on the number of years they have sung with Shane, although they themselves never had careers of any comparable accomplishment or interest.  An excellent group of instrumentalists (bass, drums, and the versatile and tasteful Ben Schubert on several instruments) provides a rock hard rhythm section and some great leads for the Trio today (although this was recently reduced to just a bass player).  Shane still will not relinquish center mike when he is on stage, regardless of who is singing lead, and he doesn't allow audio people to recreate the studio sound that helped make him famous.  The equipment exists, and it is cheap and readily available. 


There are reasons, though, that the Kingston Trio with Dave Guard was a real cultural phenomenon, and why the Trio lost a lot - and pop music lost a lot - when he left.  At least once a set with Shane's later Trios, after the applause dies down, there comes a moment when those of us with long memories fully expect to hear Guard's vaguely effeminate, distracted delivery introduce a song as he did in all those live recordings and dictated the stage patter of thousands who followed.   "The home of country western music IS in Greenwich Village….." "Okay, time to cluster our wits! Bombs away dream babies….." "But if you're too cool  - cause tonight's-the-night type thing - then rather than clap along, suck on ice cubes in 4/4 time, which satisfies inner needs as well as sociological events….",  "He was a manly man, even the cologne he used came in hairy bottles...."  "So, American soja!  You are surprised I speak your language.  You see, I was educated in your country at.......UCRA....."  You had to have been alive then, of course, but these hoary old clichés, original and not, emerged from Dave Guard.


There was the visual, the substantive image of the establishment being way cool (never to be repeated), there was the then-new sound, there was the clever patter, although hardly spontaneous, between songs.  There was genuine vocal, lyrical, and linguistic variety, far more than in subsequent Kingston Trios or in their competitors or in any major popular music act since, and if Guard's efforts were the least appreciated, they served to accent the hits, to lend tone to the whole proceedings. He made, intentionally or not, Shane the lead singer - he hired him back to the band when it was just Guard, Reynolds, and a departing couple: singer Barbara Bogue and Joe Gannon on bass.  He could, in the words of Nick Reynolds, learn anything in about three days, which made his musical improvements so easily notable.  But he was smart enough - there is no argument about his intelligence - to have realized he was a Jack of all stringed trades - an actual master of none.  And he wasn't singing lead much on the songs that were translating from album to concert, the reverse procedure from when the Trio started.  If he was the leader, he had no followers on stage; even Wheat may have viewed him as vehicle.


 The Kingston Trio recently and deservedly made the top 100 most important musical acts of the 20th century on several lists.  It was for "Tom Dooley," a song for which Dave Guard is given credit as the arranger.  His is the only member name listed.  But Bob Shane sang lead, as well as the famous plectrum banjo part.  The most requested song of the Trio's is "Scotch and Soda," and though Dave Guard took credit for writing and arranging it, he admitted it was taught to him by baseball great Tom Seaver's parents.  It is famous because Shane sang and played it as a solo.  But in the written record, ‘Dave Guard’ is the only name associated with it.


Text Box:  
The original Kinston Trio , 1990

What Guard clearly had was a personal multi-media charisma and star power that overcame his deficiencies and often rendered them irrelevant. Someone you wanted to know.  Whatever it is, Shane, with the voice and looks, and Reynolds, with exuberance and energy, do not have it.   John Stewart comes close, but somehow does not have it, and leaves the impression of effort, which Dave Guard did not.  Damned few, in fact, have it.  It is not just talent, but a combination of projected self-confidence, high intelligence, and the centered calmness so provided.  It might, as Barbara Tuchman once suggested, be in the genes or merely inculcated by repeated reminder, but it is there early or not at all.  Dave Guard talked wonderfully, wrote beautifully and wittily, charmed and enraptured, someone you had to see in performance to fully appreciate. He also was intellectually inquisitive, acquisitive, and smart enough to be, at base, sort of insecure around great natural artistic talent. The guy to his right, for example. Baffle 'em with bullshit.  


Although it was a route pioneered by the supposedly selfless Allan Lomax and The Weavers, Guard, long before it became a folk fad, took credit for songs out of the public domain he had redone but not actually written.  As the next generation of music stars discovered, you can get a lot of mileage out of being a songwriter, whether or not you actually wrote the song. 


He had the gift of inventive and memorable phrase.  He impressed men by both accomplishment, stature, and athletic ability, coupled with a certain affected and diffident modesty and great humor. Women adored him.  He could ensorcel anyone, and did.


In 1992, Lou Gottlieb related a hysterical and sad story of Dave Guard and himself having dinner with a bunch of people a few years previous. People were apparently prepared to coddle Guard, although no such instructions had been given.  After all, Guard was then essentially broke, he had cancer, he had no real prospects, no recent successes, he was balding with a modest pot, and yet he had beautiful women of every age staring at him as demented bassets would view a tenderloin slathered in butter.  Women fought to sit next to him, the men to talk to him, everyone laughed at his jokes and listened enraptured to his stories. And this was a gathering that included the very smart, charming, and funny Lou Gottlieb. Gottlieb said Guard could have had, without question, any woman from youngest to oldest that night and borrowed money from any of the men without repayment.  (Even from Gottlieb, who had watched Guard lift part of Gottlieb's own comedy routines and make them his before audiences many times larger than the Limeliters ever reached.  How many comedians look fondly on those who rip them off, even admire the thief, like them, speak tearfully of their deaths?  Guard always credited Gottlieb, but in comedy - an intellectual battlefield - that isn't the point.)  Everyone that night, including Gottlieb, felt terrific and, well, oddly grateful to be in the presence of Dave Guard, Dave-Guard-Once-Leader-Of-The-Kingston-Trio.


Sidestepping hyperbole with difficulty, it ought to be said that on this very much lesser stage Guard recalls British Prime Minister Arthur Balfour sixty years before.  It was said that after a dinner with Balfour (who invented the weekend, by the way, for which he ought to be receiving some odd recognition from those who profit from that institution), everyone felt they had been terribly witty, insightful, and wasn't Arthur a good guest?  Such a good listener!  And by the way, dear, didn't I talk particularly well tonight?


Those with objective memories would recall that Balfour had done virtually all the talking and simply enraptured the crowd, but leaving them with the feeling that they had been the stars.  Guard apparently could do that, on stage and in person, elevating the proceedings - lending tone, as it were - and thereby leaving people feeling grateful and sometimes vaguely resentful towards him without actually knowing why. This is evidenced within his band, his audiences, and perhaps in his personal life, of which I know nothing.


I never met the man, but based on the almost uniform opinions of the several diverse people I know who had, Guard was, I think, partially like Arthur Balfour. Dave Guard was a sort of natural aristocrat with what was once called the common touch, and he inspired the reactions among people that social estate always has, given their whims.  There are those willing to believe anything bad of them, and those anything good.  Shane has described Guard as half genius, half bullshit, which in no way contradicts this theorem.  Because even if true, it fails to acknowledge that bullshit has its charms and music.


Alistaire Cooke wrote, in reference to Edward VIII, that the fortunate should beware being thought of as only at their best when the going is good. Although his own bitterness is not given the attention that Shane's has - primarily because nobody cared, after a while, to record it - Guard was not entirely a paragon of grace when his post Kingston years never lived up to the promise, and he should not be recalled as such. But whatever his faults, and whatever their own inclinations, nobody seems to think ill of Dave Guard, almost increasingly charming and good intentioned as he drifted towards the light, dying of lymphoma over his last several years.  The warmth he generated lasts yet in those who saw him in the Trio's prime a half century ago.


Text Box:  With the Shaws near  the end. 1988, Guard released an album (Up and In) that actually was pretty good, with catchy songs and the voices of his past lives.  Although it was received by the industry with the warmth normally reserved for new releases from high school glee clubs, it actually sounds as if they had a good time with the thing, and there are good songs to steal on it. Guard's actual songwriting was, in fact, always pretty good.   His taste in other's material was of a high order.


Sometime around then, the original Kingston Trio had their last picture taken together, and there seems to have been some peace achieved.  Guard hides his right hand, which in subsequent photos in New Hampshire with his last hosts, Rick and Ingrid Shaw, looks frozen in a grip.  He was dying a painful death. 


There was a modest service in New Hampshire after his passing. Shane and many others showed for a sing along in Guard's honor.  I, a former New Englander, thought it sad one of the first surfing rock stars passed over so far away from what he loved all his life in the drizzle and clouds of the East. He deserved better, I think. Much.  Even if something of a benign musical con and possessing a theatrical act of intellect, his best as a performer - based on the success of his intent, on stage or not - was very, very good indeed. 

Text Box:  
Fare You Well

And no matter what, he knew that the millions of couples' first dates hosted by Dave Guard and his band on wax or in concert would be his elegant legacy; and that once that spell is questioned, or revisited, it is broken and cannot be reestablished.  Fifteen years after he left the Kingston Trio, it was impossible for such a thing to be risked.  Guard wanted to be asked to rejoin the Kingston Trio by Shane in 1975, but he probably would, in the end, even if there had been no salacious humor, have had to decline.  


Artistic differences, you know.


With the possible exception of Bob Shane, you will have to work to find anyone who will say anything at all bad about Dave Guard, which is suspicious because outside Guard's family, Shane may be the person who knew him best.   It may be that people actually liked Guard as much as they say they did - but it may also be a sense of an era gone, a sense that Guard represented the very best that his generation could ever imagine being: tall, handsome, star athlete, artistic, intellectual, smooth, rich and successful.  Mixing generations and disciplines, Cary Grant crossed on John Elway crossed on …..who?


In fact, Guard - an utterly forgotten icon - created, whether they knew it or not, the on-stage behavioral mannerisms of everyone within two separations of seeing the original Kingston Trio (not excluding African-American performers) from all the folkies to John Phillips, The Beatles, Crosby/Stills/Nash/Young, James Taylor, Richie Havens, Lyndsey Buckingham, the Beach Boys, and all of their professional and cultural descendents.   He looked the leader - not just of the band, but of the evening, the event, the audience - and he acted the leader so well this role was uncontested by all, including Shane.  It was a presence that many emulated, most unsuccessfully. 


He wrote well, both simple music and often elegant and certainly memorable prose.  His album liner notes without fail contain at least one phrase to sing in memory. "Furrowed brow sincerity" is one of my favorites.  It was his presence at the Reunion that may have cowed all the others to blandness, since most were pale imitations of Dave Guard at his best and they knew it - or at least sensed it.  


He was a leader with many followers, but with the exception of John Stewart who carefully aped as much as possible, none of them served in the original Kingston Trio, whose members and associates knew him all too well.


Odd, because the Trio was Bob Shane's from the first album, but probably nobody knew it then.   Except, I think, Dave Guard.


And few suggest it now, because Shane does not, ironically, receive the warmth that naturally flowed towards Guard in restrained, respectful waves.  Given what must have been some ugly and bitter fights between the original three, it must be tough for Bob Shane to see this without having received his own, long overdue credit.


Fans of the Trio are trying to resurrect the reputation, hoping to get them, based solely on their huge record sales, into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and into the Country Music pantheon.  They deserve both and more, but they are very heavy-handed about it, as Shane is when he puts down his guitar and - there is no other word - whines on stage about the respect the group is owed and does not get. It is awkward to listen, and it contrasts with the smooth, superior stance of Guard, and underlines the embarrassing probability that Guard's dignified presence would most likely have achieved both goals a while ago, and seemingly without effort.


Bob Shane toned down his mumbling vitriol in later years, and certainly since Guard's death as an apparent indigent in New Hampshire he has been a gentleman, which he is by inclination.  He claims they had healing visits, buried the hatchet, and that's that. But he has said some odd things, perhaps trying to come to terms with Guard's definite but hard to describe contributions to the band's success.  And to his own.


Text Box:  
The Kingston Trio, 1960: Bob Shane, Dave Guard, Nick Reynolds

In his tribute to Guard on the inevitable website, Shane reveals his betrayal mind-set by making the bizarre comment that if Guard had stayed in the Trio, they might not have been displaced by the Beatles so quickly and in the manner they were (which was total annihilation).  That is surreal.  Among other things, it gives no indication Shane sees the Beatles as more than just another band, perhaps because, he told me, the Beatles opened for the Kingston Trio on their first tour of England, a story I cannot confirm.   It fails to describe what Guard would have, could have, done different.  It suggests Guard failed in his role as the brains and let them down, leaving in a huff if he couldn't get his way in everything.  True or not, it has the whiff of pettiness that plagues Shane.  Because Guard is given way too much credit for The Kingston Trio while Shane and Reynolds (who doesn't seem to care much) far too little, Shane is understandably reluctant to give his former partner any advantage to history by praising him now. 


When the Trio last played in Boulder, a year after Guard's death, Shane told me, within a puzzling extended answer to my query about whether or not it was true Guard died deep in debt, "Dave became the sort of person he used to make fun of, the kind he swore he would never become."  Whatever, precisely, that was.  It's probably not fair to guess.  Regardless, Shane was really, really mad about it.  Still.  Fuming, he got his guitar and drink and waited for the introduction, standing in the dark on the side of the Boulder Theater stage.  Nick Reynolds, who had rejoined for a ten year stint with two bad hips, limped right behind him, and George Grove prepared to lead out.


After the introduction, Bob Shane - the quintessential pro - smiled, went out on stage, stood in Guard's place, sang some of Guard's verses in the old songs, surrendering the ones he himself used to sing to partners new and old, stood in the dark shadow of a slightly taller, sadder ghost with a long necked banjo, appended ever to that center microphone of The Kingston Trio, forty years on. 


Dave Guard, when once asked rather cruelly how he wished to be recalled as he was trying to reenter the business, said he wanted to be remembered for having done his best, and since he is recalled rarely and only by those who care - which is to say only those having only seen him at his best - he is.  Bob Shane, though, may only be remembered for his nightly work in the clubs and small concerts that have been his fate since 1967, which is to say the last seventy-five percent of his career when he was older, his voice in decline, and then mostly gone. 


This is a horrible travesty.  Bob Shane is a singer to whom Frank Sinatra paid the incredible compliment of refusing to record a song seemingly written for him, Scotch and Soda, because Shane had done it too well. Frank Sinatra. That's how good Bob Shane was, even at age twenty-four.  But Dave Guard is the only member with his name attached to the song, a hit record on which he did not sing or play, and of a tune he accepted royalties for but did not, really, write. 


It isn't fair to the Kingston Trio, maybe, or to Bob Shane in particular or cultural history in general, but there you go.   It's how it happens.§





May 1, 2003.  This article was going to be part of a book about how history is written.  As that continued (and continues) to sputter along, this excerpt was originally put together in the mid 1990’s and has been updated several times: unsuccessfully, I now note, assisted by several Trio fans. There are ages and durations of Trio involvement that were changed as time ground on and now do not make sense and need correlation.   So, if 1957 is the KT’s start, it is now in its forty-first year, which is the forty six years since 1957 less the five years between the original disbandment and Shane starting the New Kingston Trio in 1972.   Shane and Guard were born in 1936, and Reynolds the year previous.  So it depends on one remaining consistent, and I wasn’t.  My apologies.


I also did not mention the object of Shane’s affair because I needed confirmation beyond Shane telling me.  I’ve now gotten it.   It was Judy Henske, and one can imagine Guard’s reaction.   Even before the Whiskeyhill Singers disbanded, Henske was being replaced, and much if not all of the second unreleased album featured another singer altogether. 

[1] He still does.  Yet, the Smothers Brothers are the only act for which the Kingston Trio will ever open, by Shane's dictate.

Home Boulder Lout Columns Commentary DCPA Forums
All material on this site copyright Richard L. MacLeod (Dark Cloud) 1968-2015 unless otherwise stated.